Ok, hopefully java.net is up now.
And of course: I would vote for a) and marking all other EJB 2.1 things as proposed OPTIONAL in 3.2.
Stefan!
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Marina Vatkina [mailto:marina.vatkina_at_oracle.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. Juni 2011 23:42
An: Stefan Heldt
Betreff: Re: AW: [jsr345-experts] Re: Working draft documents are available for review
Hi Stefan,
As proposed optional :).
You might need to resend your reply, if it is not delivered to the aliases when java.net is back up.
thanks,
-marina
Stefan Heldt wrote:
> I would vote for a) and marking all other EJB 2.1 things as proposed final in 3.2.
>
> Stefan!
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Marina Vatkina [mailto:marina.vatkina_at_oracle.com]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. Juni 2011 02:34
> An: jsr345-experts_at_ejb-spec.java.net
> Betreff: [jsr345-experts] Re: Working draft documents are available
> for review
>
> We have 2 choices:
>
> a) make optional in this release features that were defined as
> proposed optional in 3.1;
> b) make them optional in the next release (or later) when we have more features that reach this option.
>
> What would be your preference?
>