Hi,
On 01/03/2013 07:48 AM, Sivakumar Thyagarajan wrote:
>> One could argue that min-pool-size / max-pool-size are vendor specific
>> too. However, we all have a concept of what those mean in each context.
>
> Yes, but a pool (that backs a connector CF) would atleast have a 'min'
> and 'max' size. This is the assumption adopted by all other resource
> definition annotations (DataSourceDefinition, JMSConnectionFactory
> Definition), that are backed by pools
>
My point was that we all agree on the definition of min / max pool size.
That isn't the case for security.
Best regards,
Jesper