Great - thanks for the info :-).
On 5/29/2013 10:34 AM, Bruno Borges wrote:
> Save time. ADF Essentials can't go to SDK. It's license is incompatible.
>
> ADF Essentials is not open sourced, and it cannot be distributed. All
> it has is a license that enables users to freely run on whatever they
> want (GF, Tomcat, WLS, WAS, JBoss, etc...).
>
> On 05/29/2013 11:06 AM, Reza Rahman wrote:
>> Response in-line:
>>
>> On 5/29/2013 1:30 AM, Vijay Nair wrote:
>>>
>>> Can we do it tomorrow evening (i.e. 30th May) at 7 PM IST ? I will
>>> setup a Beehive
>>>
>> I guess that's 9:30 AM on the 30th for me? That definitely works.
>>>
>>> I have used Facelet templates now and separated it as widgets to be
>>> placed in any page (e.g. Dashboard/Tracking etc...) .... I will
>>> check-it in post your review so that I do not break any thing
>>> unintentionally.....
>>>
>> You can check in and I'll do any refactor necessary. The next time I
>> am demoing this is on the 4th and then again of the 18th. Please do
>> make sure it looks reasonably ready for customer demos (e.g.
>> consistent look/feel across related pages, etc). Otherwise, you could
>> always check in a bit later when the changes are more complete?
>>>
>>> As part of a suitable JSF library for later can we use PrimeFaces or
>>> the likes ?
>>>
>> I would prefer PrimeFaces myself since it seems like by far the most
>> popular one, but we should probably evaluate ADF Faces if it can be
>> used without necessarily having to introduce ADF Essentials as well
>> (and it has reasonable free documentation). Anyways, that's probably
>> still a little bit far off and we'll need to go through the usual
>> Oracle legal approval process since this project may be included in
>> the Java EE SDK at some point.
>>>
>>> Thanks...Vijay
>>>
>>> *From:*Reza Rahman
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 28, 2013 9:46 PM
>>> *To:* users_at_cargotracker.java.net
>>> *Subject:* Re: Websocket implementation
>>>
>>> BTW, feel free to use Facelet templates (obviously) and also custom
>>> components where they make real sense (it would show the key JSF
>>> feature off nicely). At some point, we'll need to think about a
>>> suitable JSF widget library too and it would demonstrate the power
>>> of the JSF ecosystem nicely.
>>>
>>> On 5/28/2013 11:55 AM, Reza Rahman wrote:
>>>
>>> Looks good. Could we do a brief walk through on BeeHive or
>>> Google Hangout? We can go over the design options for the HTML 5
>>> parts that way (I am still a little wary about IE users, which
>>> is still a lot of people so would like to keep those portions a
>>> bit standalone with sensible fall backs)? You could do a
>>> check-in as long as things don't look functionally incomplete (I
>>> currently use the application for Java EE real world demos).
>>>
>>> On 5/27/2013 1:13 PM, Vijay Nair wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Reza,
>>>
>>> I have given a minor face-lift to the application and
>>> realigned the templates a bit. I have attached a screen shot
>>> of the landing page (for Admin) and the corresponding drill
>>> down page on click of a tracking ID. Could you suggest where
>>> we need to implement the live streaming (i.e. on the
>>> dashboard or the drill down ?)
>>>
>>> Do note that these are representative screens and I have
>>> added some sample widgets to the dashboard (Like Cargos in
>>> progress/Completed Cargos/Quick Search etc...). Will change
>>> the content basis the requirement.
>>>
>>> Thanks...Vijay
>>>
>>
>
> --
> |Bruno Borges (twitter @brunoborges)
> Principal Product Manager | Java WebLogic Coherence GlassFish
> Oracle LAD PM Team | Cloud Application Foundation
> +55 11 5187 6514 (Work) | +55 11 99564 9058 (Mobi)|