I totally agree. I have a product in production and I can now only
support FF2 and am getting flack about when FF3 will be supported.
Changing to Icefaces is a many month process for me.
autozoom wrote:
> Maybe I am not reading the right forums or mailing lists, but I would really
> like to know the progress about deploying the final woodstock 4.2 release
> with fixes for FF3.
> Downgrading from 4.3 to 4.2 I have also found a big issue about autocomplete
> fields in 4.2, which overlaps the text field and doesn't react to key
> presses at times.
>
> Are there dates we can rely on? No news is bad news in this case.
>
> I am also studying the icefaces framework; it's quite good, but it lacks a
> something that I use very much in woodstock, that is the possibility to
> $(id).refresh() just the components I want and not the entire page.
>
> This is a big issue in my opinion, refer to woodstock to icefaces migration
> forum on icefaces site to read about it.
>
> I really hope some progress will be achieved soon
>
> thanks Mauro
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/final-woodstock-4.2-release--tp21541085p21541085.html
> Sent from the Project Woodstock - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_woodstock.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_woodstock.dev.java.net
>
>
> .
>
>