We're already in production since october, and porting to Icefaces will take
weeks if not months.
Sun please give us a word about this.
Paolo Proni wrote:
>
> Ciao,
> I suggest you to change the framework, if you are still on time.
> The developement of Woodstock has been a big "botta sui denti" for me...
>
> Paolo
>
>
> autozoom ha scritto:
>> Maybe I am not reading the right forums or mailing lists, but I would
>> really
>> like to know the progress about deploying the final woodstock 4.2 release
>> with fixes for FF3.
>> Downgrading from 4.3 to 4.2 I have also found a big issue about
>> autocomplete
>> fields in 4.2, which overlaps the text field and doesn't react to key
>> presses at times.
>>
>> Are there dates we can rely on? No news is bad news in this case.
>>
>> I am also studying the icefaces framework; it's quite good, but it lacks
>> a
>> something that I use very much in woodstock, that is the possibility to
>> $(id).refresh() just the components I want and not the entire page.
>>
>> This is a big issue in my opinion, refer to woodstock to icefaces
>> migration
>> forum on icefaces site to read about it.
>>
>> I really hope some progress will be achieved soon
>>
>> thanks Mauro
>>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_woodstock.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_woodstock.dev.java.net
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/final-woodstock-4.2-release--tp21541085p21542749.html
Sent from the Project Woodstock - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.