users@websocket-spec.java.net

[jsr356-users] [jsr356-experts] Re: Re: License for RI API

From: Jitendra Kotamraju <jitendra.kotamraju_at_oracle.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 21:55:00 +0100

This issue is fixed in repo.

Jitu
On 11/8/12 1:02 AM, Jitendra Kotamraju wrote:
> Thanks for pointing it out, that need to be fixed. They should have
> the standard GlassFish license as in other RI files[1]
>
> Jitu
> [1]
> http://java.net/projects/tyrus/sources/source-code-repository/content/trunk/containers/tyrus-servlet/src/main/java/org/glassfish/tyrus/servlet/WebSocketServlet.java?rev=195
>
> On 11/7/12 3:31 PM, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>>
>> Danny,
>>
>> the pom.xml file for the API says that it can be distributed under
>> either CDDL or GPLv2
>>
>> However the individual files only list GPLv2 in their headers.
>>
>> This makes it rather difficult to use/distribute the API with things
>> that are either GPL incompatible (or just GPL phobic if not actually
>> incompatible).
>>
>> Would it be possible to dual licence the API? As it is we are
>> working with our own version that we have reverse engineered from the
>> published documentation - but that is hardly a good way to go as we
>> are already several changes behind.
>>
>> regards
>>
>> PS. Due to the time pressures of getting IP clearance through the
>> eclipse process, this is probably critical path for us to do an
>> eclipse release of jetty with an RFC implementation in Q1 2013 -
>> seriously!
>>
>>
>> --
>> Greg Wilkins <gregw_at_intalio.com <mailto:gregw_at_intalio.com>>
>> http://www.webtide.com
>> Developer advice and support from the Jetty & CometD experts.
>