jsr356-experts@websocket-spec.java.net

[jsr356-experts] Re: Fwd: [jsr356-users] TCK Access

From: Mark Thomas <mark_at_homeinbox.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 22:14:34 +0000

On 25/03/2013 23:46, Justin Lee wrote:
> Should it be visible on the project site? because I don't see it anywhere.

No. You get it though Java Licensee Engineering. You'll get a link and
an login once you request it.

Mark


> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Danny Coward <danny.coward_at_oracle.com
> <mailto:danny.coward_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> (for Justin) Here's the note about TCK access.
>
> - Danny
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [jsr356-users] [jsr356-experts] TCK Access
> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:53:27 -0800
> From: Danny Coward <danny.coward_at_oracle.com>
> <mailto:danny.coward_at_oracle.com>
> Reply-To: jsr356-experts_at_websocket-spec.java.net
> <mailto:jsr356-experts_at_websocket-spec.java.net>
> To: jsr356-experts_at_websocket-spec.java.net
> <mailto:jsr356-experts_at_websocket-spec.java.net>
>
>
>
> Hi Mark and all,
>> On a related note, will the TCK be made available to the EG members? If
>> so, any idea when?
> Sorry for the delay, I'm a bit new to the new way of the TCKs !
>
> In short: yes and you can start looking at it now, but read on.
>
> Everyone in the expert group can get access to the TCK for review
> purposes. The access ends once the spec goes final, and at that
> point you have to license the TCK. You can send any feedback to me.
> As of now, we do have some TCK tests there, and they are tracking
> the version of the API that Tyrus our RI supports. But, as you'd
> expect at this point, the tests are incomplete and evolving fast. We
> expect it to get much more complete in the next month or so.
>
> You can send any feedback on the TCK to me, and feel free to bring
> up spec issues looking at the TCK may bring up to the expert group.
> The details on the terms under which you get access are below.
>
> If you/your company is an existing Java EE licensee, then Oracle
> will set up the access through the contact at Oracle you use for
> Java Licensee Engineering.
>
> If you/your company is not an existing Java EE licensee, then drop
> me and Lance a note (Lance.Andersen_at_oracle.com
> <mailto:Lance.Andersen_at_oracle.com>). If you are not sureor if you
> are not sure/don't know who your Java Licensee Engineering person
> is, then drop me and Lance a note (Lance.Andersen_at_oracle.com
> <mailto:Lance.Andersen_at_oracle.com>).
>
> OK ?
>
> - Danny
>
>
>
> " These materials are related to the proposed TCK for JSR 356 (the
> "JSR"). These materials are not "Contributions" to the JSR under the
> Java Specification Participation Agreement ("JSPA"), but are
> considered to be of potential use in your assessment of the proposed
> Specification, TCK and/or Reference Implementation. However, Oracle
> hereby grants you a license to use these materials under the same
> terms as are set forth in Section 4B of the JSPA for Contributions.
> Thus, your use of the materials is limited to "research and
> development purposes related to the activities of [the] Expert
> Group" for the JSR. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no license is
> given to copy these materials or any portion of these materials for
> the purposes of their disclosure to any third party, except that in
> the course of "research and development purposes related to the
> activities of [the] Expert Group" you may exchange comments or
> questions concerning their use or the results of using these
> materials as part of the proposed TCK, including relevant excerpts
> of the materials related to the TCK, provided such excerpts are
> inherently part of such results, but not the non-relevant portions
> of the materials themselves. "
>
>> Mark
>>
>
>
> --
> <http://www.oracle.com> *Danny Coward *
> Java EE
> Oracle Corporation
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> You can find me on the net at:
> http://antwerkz.com <http://antwerkz.com/> http://antwerkz.com/+
> http://antwerkz.com/twitter http://antwerkz.com/github