jsr356-experts@websocket-spec.java.net

[jsr356-experts] Re: [jsr356-users] License for RI API

From: Jitendra Kotamraju <jitendra.kotamraju_at_oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:02:28 -0800

Thanks for pointing it out, that need to be fixed. They should have the
standard GlassFish license as in other RI files[1]

Jitu
[1]
http://java.net/projects/tyrus/sources/source-code-repository/content/trunk/containers/tyrus-servlet/src/main/java/org/glassfish/tyrus/servlet/WebSocketServlet.java?rev=195

On 11/7/12 3:31 PM, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>
> Danny,
>
> the pom.xml file for the API says that it can be distributed under
> either CDDL or GPLv2
>
> However the individual files only list GPLv2 in their headers.
>
> This makes it rather difficult to use/distribute the API with things
> that are either GPL incompatible (or just GPL phobic if not actually
> incompatible).
>
> Would it be possible to dual licence the API? As it is we are
> working with our own version that we have reverse engineered from the
> published documentation - but that is hardly a good way to go as we
> are already several changes behind.
>
> regards
>
> PS. Due to the time pressures of getting IP clearance through the
> eclipse process, this is probably critical path for us to do an
> eclipse release of jetty with an RFC implementation in Q1 2013 -
> seriously!
>
>
> --
> Greg Wilkins <gregw_at_intalio.com <mailto:gregw_at_intalio.com>>
> http://www.webtide.com
> Developer advice and support from the Jetty & CometD experts.