This looks like useful patch; but can we consider using "xjc-arguments" rather than just "arguments". I guess it is possible that we might support JSON Grammar or similar one day so we should allow for expansion.
Might be a good time for a 1.1.3 release now before we start looking at generating proxy clients for JAX-WS 2.0
Gerard
On 6 Jun 2012, at 09:45, Pavel Bucek wrote:
> Hello Brian,
>
> I'll take a look at that, probably sometimes next week.
>
> thanks for the patch!
> Pavel
>
> On 6/6/12 2:10 AM, Brian Chapman wrote:
>> It doesn't look like WADL-25 is being watched. I posted a patch implementing the feature (allow arguments to be passed to xjc). I hope this patch can be incorporated as we need this functionality.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> Brian
>