Hi Marc:
Thanks for the updated specs. I posted a blog entry about it at
http://www.pushtotest.com/thecohenblog/wadl-update
.
I am totally supporting of what you're doing with WADL.
-Frank
On Feb 2, 2009, at 4:03 PM, Marc Hadley wrote:
> I've uploaded a draft updated specification and the schemas to:
>
> http://wadl.dev.java.net/wadl20090202.pdf
> http://wadl.dev.java.net/wadl20090202.rnc
> http://wadl.dev.java.net/wadl20090202.xsd
>
> Changes since the November 2006 Publication:
>
> - The namespace was changed to http://wadl.dev.java.net/2009/02.
> - Resolved issue 13. The status attribute was moved from the
> representation element to the
> response element. The cardinality of the response element was
> changed from 0–1 to 0–many.
> The fault element was removed.
> - Resolved issue 17. Allow parameters at top level and parameter
> references to prevent repetition when
> a parameter is used in multiple places.
> - Resolved issue 18. A resource type element may now contain
> resource child elements.
> - Resolved issue 20. Allow multiple resources elements within an
> application.
> - Updated the Atompub example to RFC syntax.
>
> Unfortunately the changes required by issue 13 were not backwards
> compatible so I had to change the namespace and existing WADL docs
> will require minor edits as a result.
>
> I haven't updated the wadl2java code to support these changes yet,
> I'll be working on that next. In the meantime I'd be grateful if one
> or more of you could sanity check the updated spec and schemas.
>
> Thanks,
> Marc.
>
> ---
> Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
> CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_wadl.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_wadl.dev.java.net
>
--
Frank Cohen, http://www.PushToTest.com, phone 408 871 0122
PushToTest, the open-source test automation company