Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:33:46 +0100
Hi Avi,
That would of course be very nice! We’ll probably also try to support both versions for a while at least; since the namespace has been changed they are easy to “tell apart”.
/Ole
Eviware.com
eviware
Ole Lensmar
ole_at_eviware.com <mailto:niclas_at_eviware.com>
tel: +46 (0)703 555 000
fax: +46 (0)8 790 61 19
From: Avi Flax [mailto:avif_at_arc90.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 16:32
To: users_at_wadl.dev.java.net
Cc: dev_at_wadl.dev.java.net
Subject: Re: Updated WADL Spec
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:10, Ole Matzura <ole_at_eviware.com> wrote:
To what extent has the previous version been adopted by tools and
developers? Should we maintain backwards compatibility for both importing
and generating WADL files? Or just importing?
Ole, just a thought off the top of my head: I might take a look at the Restlet WADL extension, to see if I can help update it to support the new version. If I do, I'm thinking that I'll be looking to see if it could possibly support both the current and the new version. The changes don't seem so large as to remove that possibility.
I don't know if that's possible in Restlet or anywhere else, but it's just a thought!
-- Avi Flax » Lead Technologist » Partner » Arc90 » http://arc90.com
(image/gif attachment: image001.gif)