Our legal pointyhead confirmed to me that the Java.net terms of use
covers patch submissions and does not require a separate signed SCA.
That makes it much easier to accept patches from folks in the community .
We will look into getting your patch in soon. :)
Shreedhar
Olaf Krische wrote:
> Ole!
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:35:26AM -0400, Joseph Fialli wrote:
>
>> Olaf Krische wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 05:21:36PM -0700, Shreedhar Ganapathy wrote:
>>>
>>>> * Partial fix for Shoal issue : [10]79 : DistributedStateCacheImpl
>>>> not thread safe.
>>>>
>>> Hm? As far as i can see from the current cvs HEAD, no partial fix regarding that has been included. :P
>>>
>> I can clear up the confusion over this issue.
>>
>> I mistakenly quoted shoal issue 79 instead of the proper shoal issue 78
>> ...
>> I have verified Olaf's patch for shoal issue 79 but was awaiting word
>> that the contributor's agreement has been signed before checking
>> in the patch submitted for shoal issue 79. (which I would like to get
>> done.)
>>
>
> Oh, that, hm. Copyright stuff is really a pain these days :)
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_shoal.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_shoal.dev.java.net
>
>