Hi Farid,
Its great to hear feedback such as this. There is certainly scope for
improvement on the performance front as we have yet to focus on that
aspect.
It'd be great if you could attach a profiler to your program such as
the one that comes with Netbeans and see where most of the time is
being spent in the call stack and let us know. Also, see if you
could change from writing to file to writing to a logger for a change
in throughput.
I have some high priority items on my list to get done so any
contributions is greatly appreciated in this area. Do also file an
issue in the issue tracker for tracking this and if possible attach
your test code.
Do let us know what you find with the profiler.
Thanks
Sheetal
On May 13, 2008, at 8:10 AM, Farid Gawi wrote:
> Hi,
> The simple performance test i did is running a Sender side which sends
> 10,000 messages (~30 bytes each message) one by one..
> The other side, The Reciever, writes to ascii file the timestamp
> (System
> millis) every 1000 message recieved!
> I do added "Xms128m -Xmx256m" to both Sender & Reciever JVM
> parameters.
> Regarding the problem with running the example on my machine, i see
> now your
> reponse posts at the archive list..
> I'll check it out and try what you suggested to do..
>
>
> Farid Ghawi
> ---------------------------
> Ivory Software Systems LTD.
> Tel: 03-5381-865
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_shoal.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_shoal.dev.java.net
>