Shreedhar Ganapathy wrote:
> Great work Bongjae. Joe and I will look into the diffs and respond soon.
Thanks Bongjae for this feature.
I will be sure to look over the diffs and provide feedback.
-Joe
>
> best regards
>
> Shreedhar
>
> Bongjae Chang wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have committed sources which try to abstract out the transport
>> layer of Shoal to SHOAL_1_1_ABSTRACTING_TRANSPORT branch.
>>
>> I tried to use JXTA and Grizzly for transport layer experimentally.
>>
>> Moreover, you can run original Shoal version which has used JXTA with
>> not abstracting out transport layer because original sources and
>> package have been preserved.
>>
>> Then, about transport layer, 3 modes exist.
>>
>> 1. original JXTA version
>> Run with -DSHOAL_GROUP_COMMUNICATION_PROVIDE="jxta", this is default.
>>
>> 2. new JXTA version which is integrated in abstracting out the
>> transport layer
>> Run with -DSHOAL_GROUP_COMMUNICATION_PROVIDE="jxtanew"
>>
>> 3. grizzly version which is integrated in abstracting out the
>> transport layer.
>> Run with -DSHOAL_GROUP_COMMUNICATION_PROVIDE="grizzly"
>>
>> I think that JGroup could be integrated easily as well, but I didn't
>> try it yet. :)
>>
>> For more details, please see the "readme_transport_abstraction.txt"
>> file which explains package structure, how to compile, how to run and
>> todo list.
>>
>> You can download sources with SHOAL_1_1_ABSTRACTING_TRANSPORT tag in
>> current Shoal cvs.
>>
>> Note that this is just experimental version.
>>
>> I am looking forward to your feedback and advice.
>>
>> I will welcome any comments, feedbacks and criticism!
>>
>> I really hope that your opinions will be applied to this version and
>> I think that I need some helps. :)
>>
>> Without hesitation, try to review it!
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> PS) If you want and need to know more informations in detail about
>> this changes, please let me know.
>>
>> --
>> Bongjae Chang