On 11/04/17 22:07, Shing Wai Chan wrote:
> Taking into account Stuart and Greg's responses, here is a revised
> proposal.
<snip/>
> ACTION: Revised recommendations are now A.e ConsumerCallback and B.c
> SupplierMap.
I'd be happy with those but I'd prefer the Map to be
Map<String,List<String>>.
Per RFC 7230 section 3.2.2 the only use case for this should be multiple
Set-Cookie headers in the response but
a) I think we should handle that; and
b) I think it is better to use the same format on the input for symmetry.
Mark