users@servlet-spec.java.net

[servlet-spec users] [jsr369-experts] Re: [SERVLET_SPEC-172-Part.write] PROPOSAL

From: Mark Thomas <markt_at_apache.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:08:07 +0100

On 29/03/17 10:58, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>
>
> On 29 March 2017 at 19:18, Edward Burns <edward.burns_at_oracle.com
> <mailto:edward.burns_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>
> Greg, what say you to this?
>
>
> I'm cool with all that - I'm not wanting to break any existing
> interpretations and just really want javadoc clarified.
>
>
> MT> @param fileName The location into which the uploaded part should
> MT> be stored. file names and relative paths are
> MT> relative to {_at_link
> MT> javax.servlet.MultipartConfigElement#getLocation()}.
> MT> Absolute paths are used as provided.
> MT> Note: that this is a system dependent string and URI
> MT> notation may not be acceptable on all systems. For
> MT> portability, this string should be generated
> with the
> MT> File or Path APIs.
>
> Mark, thanks for your concise suggestion. In the spirit of compromise,
> I vote to accept Mark's proposal here.
>
>
> That works for me. However one quibble is that "file names and
> relative paths are relative to ..." is overly verbose. It can just be
> "Relative paths are relative to ..."

No objections here.

Mark