On 21 July 2016 at 06:53, arjan tijms <arjan.tijms_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:46 AM, Greg Wilkins <gregw_at_webtide.com> wrote:
>
>> I too don't really understand the Implicit mapping? Is that for a named
>> dispatch? If so, shouldn't it be called Named?
>>
>
> The idea for the implicit boolean in the original proposal was just for
> parity with Servlet spec 12.2.1. "implicit" as a mapping was never the
> intention. But a while back we discussed there wasn't a practical use case
> for even the boolean, so this was dropped altogether.
>
So what should the mapping be for Named dispatchers? left at the original
values with the original servlet name?
Or do we need a new mapping type for Named?
cheers
--
Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com> CTO http://webtide.com