On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Greg Wilkins <gregw_at_intalio.com> wrote:
GW> More over, I'm concerned that by making CDI to servlet mapping a
GW> responsibility of the servlet container, then we are going to have to do a
GW> container to CDI adaptation for every CDI implementation out there.
>>>>> On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 09:21:45 +0100, arjan tijms <arjan.tijms_at_gmail.com> said:
AT> That should really not be a concern. The producers in question are CDI
[...]
AT> As you can see, there's no really no need for any implementation
AT> specific code anywhere. It all uses the CDI public APIs.
Ajran, while your observations are accurate, the backward compatibility
issues raised by Stuart and seconded by Greg are showstoppers for this
change in my opinion at this point.
Ed
--
| edward.burns_at_oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017