On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 09:43 +1100, Greg Wilkins wrote:
> I do think that a simple blocking message based API is going to cover
> the vast majority of use cases and thus I think it should be a first
> goal to achieve in the API. Then we can consider streams and/or
> asynchronous WS either later in this spec cycle or in the next, as
> more evidence of need is collected.
When it is done by another JSR later, I think it will be obvious it
needs at least scalability parity with HTTP. Especially given the
protocol goal. So it would really need to do non blocking.
--
Remy Maucherat <rmaucher_at_redhat.com>
Red Hat Inc