On 27 May 2011 17:32, Remy Maucherat <rmaucher_at_redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 08:21 +1000, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>> I make no representations that this is the best way to proceed, or
>> even a good way... it is just how we have done it so far. Users have
>> been warned that significant changes to this API are likely.
>
> Besides the upgrade mechanism, this has not been mentioned as being in
> scope for this JSR. Which is quite understandable IMO, it's a lot of
> spec work on something that is not finalized yet.
Remy,
it is in the JSR340 proposal:
http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/proposalDetails?id=340