V B Kumar,
I am working on Apache Axis project in SAAJ/JAX-RPC.
I plan to keep in sync with this RI behavior on the addChildElement() after it is clarified.
Can you give any hint about when the next rev. of spec is scheduled?
Will it be published on
http://java.sun.com/j2ee/1.4/docs/api/?
Thanks.
----- Original Message -----
From: "V B Kumar Jayanti" <Vbkumar.Jayanti_at_Sun.COM>
To: <users_at_saaj.dev.java.net>
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: [SAAJ-USR] SOAPElement#addChildElement() question?
> Hi,
>
> Jongjin Choi wrote:
>
>>Dear V B Kumar,
>>
>>Thanks for your response.
>>
>>The problem is, I think, that the users of SAAJ API expect same behavior under other implementation of SAAJ,
>>but they get different result under other SAAJ implementation.
>>I think this undocumented behavior may hurts the application portability.
>>
>>In my testing, I got the different results with Axis1.2 and WebLogic 9 beta.
>>IMO, If this behavior is recommended, this should be documented or checked by TCK.
>>
>>
> the next spec revision of SAAJ will include a clarification on this.
>
>>One thing,
>>if I modify the code like this:
>>
>>SOAPElement sq = sb.addChildElement("getStockQuote", "", "http://www.tempuri.org/stockquote"); // (1)
>>SOAPElement symbol = sq.addChildElement("symbol", "", "");
>>
>>expecting that the result will be:
>><getStockQuote xmlns="http://www.tempuri.org/stockquote">
>><symbol xmlns="">... </symbol>
>></getStockQuite>
>>
>>
> this should also be doable with the next release of SAAJ RI
>
> regards,
> kumar
>
>>But the result is:
>><getStockQuote xmlns="http://www.tempuri.org/stockquote">
>><symbol>... </symbol>
>></getStockQuite>
>>
>
>>
>>Thanks.
>>
>>/Jongjin
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "V B Kumar Jayanti" <Vbkumar.Jayanti_at_Sun.COM>
>>To: <users_at_saaj.dev.java.net>
>>Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 8:53 PM
>>Subject: Re: [SAAJ-USR] SOAPElement#addChildElement() question?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Jongjin Choi wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>I hava a question about SOAPElement#addChildElement().
>>>>
>>>>With the following code,
>>>>
>>>>SOAPMessage msg = MessageFactory.newInstance().createMessage();
>>>>SOAPEnvelope se = msg.getSOAPPart().getEnvelop();
>>>>SOAPBody sb = se.getBody();
>>>>SOAPElement sq = sb.addChildElement("getStockQuote", "ns1", "http://www.tempuri.org/stockquote"); // (1)
>>>>SOAPElement symbol = sq.addChildElement("symbol");
>>>>System.out.println("sq.getNamespaceURI() = " + sq.getNamespaceURI());
>>>>System.out.println("symbol.getNamespaceURI() = " + symbol.getNamespaceURI());
>>>>msg.writeTo(System.out);
>>>>
>>>>The result is (I reformat SOAP message for readability) :
>>>>sq.getNamespaceURI() = http://www.tempuri.org/stockquote
>>>>symbol.getNamespaceURI() = null
>>>>
>>>><SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
>>>><SOAP-ENV:Header/>
>>>><SOAP-ENV:Body>
>>>><ns1:getStockQuote xmlns:ns1="http://www.tempuri.org/stockquote">
>>>><symbol>FOO</symbol>
>>>></ns1:getStockQuote>
>>>></SOAP-ENV:Body>
>>>></SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
>>>>
>>>>So far so good, but I change (1) of the above code
>>>>SOAPElement sq = sb.addChildElement("getStockQuote", "", "http://www.tempuri.org/stockquote");
>>>>
>>>>The result is :
>>>>sq.getNamespaceURI() = http://www.tempuri.org/stockquote
>>>>symbol.getNamespaceURI() = http://www.tempuri.org/stockquote
>>>>
>>>><SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
>>>><SOAP-ENV:Header/>
>>>><SOAP-ENV:Body>
>>>><getStockQuote xmlns="http://www.tempuri.org/stockquote">
>>>><symbol>FOO</symbol>
>>>></getStockQuote>
>>>></SOAP-ENV:Body>
>>>></SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
>>>>
>>>>It's strange. I think the result should be (under soapbody):
>>>><getStockQuote xmlns="http://www.tempuri.org/stockquote">
>>>><symbol xmlns="">FOO</symbol>
>>>></getStockQuote>
>>>>
>>>>It seems that SOAPElement.addChildElement() behaves differently whether the parent element has prefix or not.
>>>>The SAAJ 1.2 spec is not clear about this. Is this a bug of currrent SAAJ impl or Is it intentional?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>I agree that the spec is not clear on this. But this has been the
>>>behavior of SAAJ impl.
>>>Are you stuck because of this ?.
>>>
>>>thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>I tested it under SUN Java System Application Server PE8 2005Q1, but JWSDP 1.5 gives the same result.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>/Jongjin Choi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_saaj.dev.java.net
>>>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_saaj.dev.java.net
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_saaj.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_saaj.dev.java.net
>
>