Stefan Tilkov wrote:
> On 05.06.2009, at 15:02, Bill Burke wrote:
>
>> Because 30 million other frameworks already do this, including a few
>> in Java EE (JSF, JSP).
>
> Yes, and about 29,999,997 of them suck.
>
> I see no reason at all why a RESTful framework should not offer decent
> support for HTML. On the other hand, I concur that JAX-RS should contain
> none of that Web-hiding component nonsense.
>
> OK, I take that back; let me rephrase: I think it would only be logical
> if JAX-RS supported a way to create a RESTful web application as well as
> a RESTful web service.
>
Then JSP integration should be enough, no?
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com