On Jun 23, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
> I always wondered why this information wasn't available (param
> names)...
>
I don't know but its a real shame.
Marc.
> Marc Hadley wrote:
>> https://jsr311.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44
>> Should we make the value of @*Param annotations optional when used
>> with fields and bean properties. E.g. should:
>> @QueryParam String foo;
>> be equivalent to:
>> @QueryParam("foo") String foo;
>> Unfortunately this won't work on method parameters since their
>> names are not preserved in class files.
>> Seems like a reasonable shortcut to me but, as I haven't found
>> specifying the value particularly irksome so far, I don't have a
>> strong opinion either way.
>> Opinions ?
>> Marc.
>> ---
>> Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
>> CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_jsr311.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_jsr311.dev.java.net
>
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> http://bill.burkecentral.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_jsr311.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_jsr311.dev.java.net
>
---
Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.