Re: JSR311: Re: ContextResolver removal

From: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:29:49 -0400

On Jun 11, 2008, at 9:56 AM, Paul Sandoz wrote:

> Bill Burke wrote:
>>> Jersey provides a JSON specific JAXBContext implementation that
>>> inherits from JAXBContext. So far there has been no need to
>>> utilize produce/consume for such support.
>>> An alternative may be to include the media type as an argument to
>>> the get method i.e. is the direction, consuming or producing
>>> important?
>>> It may also be useful to consider using context resolver for
>>> obtaining the JAXB unmarshaller/marshaller for a type as well
>>> since properties can be set of these. This straightforward to
>>> support.
>> I still think ContextResolver is an implementation detail and ad-
>> hoc dependency injection. We would be doing this very very
>> differently if we were building on top of an existing DI
>> mechanism. We would not be adding a new component type.
> Say for instance we had an existing DI mechanism. How would you go
> about specifying a portable solution for obtaining of an application
> specific JAXBContext for a JAXB type?
I was wondering about this too. Its pretty straightforward as a
private contact between an application supplied MessageBody[Reader|
Writer] but I don't see an esy

> Paul.
> --
> | ? + ? = To question
> ----------------\
> Paul Sandoz
> x38109
> +33-4-76188109
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at>
CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.