dev@jsr311.java.net

Re: jsr-303 alignment

From: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 17:09:57 -0400

Me too, an example would be great.

Marc.

On Sep 5, 2007, at 5:01 PM, Ryan McDonough wrote:

> +1 from me. I'm interested in seeing what you're thinking Dhanji.
>
> Ryan-
>
> On 9/5/07, Paul Sandoz <Paul.Sandoz_at_sun.com> wrote:
>> Dhanji R. Prasanna wrote:
>>> An *initial* reaction suggests that we should leave this entirely
>>> to a
>>> user (bootstrap, validate, feedback error). However, since I
>>> recall Paul
>>> saying we want jsr311 to be a complete *usable* API it might be
>>> worth
>>> considering if/whether we want to integrate jsr303 in some (even
>>> optional) way. For instance, in the Response.Builder.
>>>
>>> I can explain a bit more about how bean validation in jsr303
>>> works if
>>> anyone is interested. Thoughts?
>>>
>>
>> IMHO it would be most helpful, at least to me!, to provide a
>> couple of
>> examples from the perspective of a 311 developer i.e. this will help
>> explain why 303 is useful and what benefits it offers before we
>> get into
>> the deeper technical aspects of how 303 works and determine
>> whether some
>> optional integration is required.
>>
>> Paul.
>>
>> --
>> | ? + ? = To question
>> ----------------\
>> Paul Sandoz
>> x38109
>> +33-4-76188109
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_jsr311.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_jsr311.dev.java.net
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ryan J. McDonough
> http://www.damnhandy.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_jsr311.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_jsr311.dev.java.net
>

---
Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.