Re: Proposal for rework of spi package (was Re: "Dual dispatch")

From: Paul Sandoz <Paul.Sandoz_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:34:44 +0200

Paul Sandoz wrote:
> In the the case of the type provider it is less clear if the application
> should do accept checking and what the mime types should be if it wants
> to check. It may lead to cases where success is expected but results in
> 415 responses where roll back is not possible, for example when using
> conneg for POST/PUT that returns something.


> Thus although i think it a good thing that a type provider can serialize
> to more than one format and i am so sure about using it as a substitute
> for @ProduceMime.

s/i am so sure/i am not so sure/


| ? + ? = To question
    Paul Sandoz