ok, so it will fall in the not portable features. Fine while not prevented
by the spec :).
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2017-02-09 17:40 GMT+01:00 Dmitry Kornilov <dmitry.kornilov_at_oracle.com>:
> It means that in the spec it will be said that using @JsonbProperty on
> constructor parameters is required for proper matching. If it’s not used,
> matching is not guaranteed.
>
>
>
> --Dmitry
>
>
>
> *From: *Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau_at_tomitribe.com>
> *Reply-To: *<jsr367-experts_at_jsonb-spec.java.net>
> *Date: *Thursday, 9 February 2017 at 17:29
> *To: *<jsr367-experts_at_jsonb-spec.java.net>
> *Subject: *[jsonb-spec users] [jsr367-experts] Re: JsonbCreator parameter
> names
>
>
>
> kind of agree but what does it mean? @JsonbCreator(jvmParameters = true)
> and default to false and @JsonbProperty?
>
>
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
>
> @rmannibucau
>
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
> https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com
>
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
> 2017-02-09 17:28 GMT+01:00 <cepoi.eugen_at_gmail.com>:
>
> Yes but this is not guaranteed to work. The method and constructor
> parameter names are available if the code has been compiled with debug
> symbols on. Which is the case most of the time.
>
> I think having an annotation to name parameters is the must have and the
> automatic resolution is optional but nice to have.
>
> Eugen
>
>
> On Feb 9, 2017, at 1:00 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau_at_tomitribe.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Roman,
>
>
>
> can't we use java 8 Parameter if property annotation is not there? it is
> possible to keep names in the bytecode now and access it through reflection.
>
>
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
>
> @rmannibucau
>
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
> https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com
>
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
> 2017-02-09 9:57 GMT+01:00 Roman Grigoriadi <roman.grigoriadi_at_oracle.com>:
>
> Hi experts,
>
> There is no clear explanation in the spec how JsonbCreator parameter names
> should be resolved and mapped. I am suggesting making JsonbProperty
> annotation mandatory for parameters of JsonbCreators, so the name can be
> resolved unambiguously.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman
>
>
>
>
>