On 20.02.15 11:10, Hendrik Dev wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Przemyslaw Bielicki
> <pbielicki_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> @Hendrik - no I was serious about system / environment properties because
>> this is a common way of overriding compiled properties/settings in different
>> test and (pre)production environments. I also proposed a specialized
>> JsonbConfig interface which is more generic approach, thus system properties
>> can be considered as a dead-issue (or trolling if you prefer ;)
> I clearly prefer the "specialized JsonbConfig" approach, not a big fan
> of system props to be honest.
>
>> As I said before - I'm a supporter or the opinion that API should contain
>> only interfaces and exception classes. I'm open for some extremely useful
>> exceptions to this rule but all the ppl here should be aware that changing
>> something in RI will be quick and easy while if we make mistake or want to
>> change anything in the API classes it might take months (even for simple
>> change) because of JCP process.
> agree
>
>> I think you should post your diffs as email attachment. I prefer github but
>> as I understand we are not going to use it for this project, so we have to
>> get used to pure git.
> Patches attached
Thanks, all applied.
MartiNG