Hi,
I don't see the overlap with -B, and I think at this point proper
places to discuss JEP198 are 374 (JSON-P) and especially 366 mailing
lists. JEP198 is planned for no sooner than JDK 9, so it is out of scope
of 367. We should of course watch the progress there and adapt if needed
and possible.
MartiNG
On 28.11.14 20:06, pbielicki_at_gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Did you guys see Werner Keil's comment on JSR review ballot?
> He brings an interesting point and puts on the table
> http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/198
>
> Doesn't this JEP overlap a bit with JSON-P & B?
> I understand that this JSR (367) targets mainly EE audience but there
> is more in Java than EE, isn't it?
>
> Also, it is not clear for me if we could use Java 8 features (e.g.
> lambdas or streams) in the RI.
>
> Cheers,
> Przemyslaw