Anissa,
Sorry... I realize now that you meant for maven only (which is what you
said). Yes, jsftemplating-1.2.jar or something similar is fine.
Perhaps the full name w/ the date is appropriate since we're likely to
replace this many times and may need to archive the older ones. Not sure...
Ken
Ken Paulsen wrote:
>
> Hi Anissa,
>
> You understood what I meant. None of the GlassFish jars in the GF/lib
> directory have version #'s in their name. The webui-jsf.jar doesn't.
> Adding a YYYYMMDD to the jar name also would require packager changes
> each time we update (not sure if that applies to v3 or not). I just
> like having a consistent name.
>
> However, if you feel we should have a different jar file name, we can
> do that. I'm not strongly opposed to it. :)
>
> Ken
>
> Anissa Lam wrote:
>> Ken,
>> I am not sure if i like to 'hide' the version # from the name of the
>> jar.
>> I prefer to see jsftemplating-1.1.jar instead of
>> jsftemplating.jar and then have to look at the version in the
>> Manifest file.
>> It seems that all other jars in the repository has the version # in
>> the jar name.
>> Do i misunderstand what you proposing ?
>>
>> thanks.
>> Anissa.
>>
>> Senthil Chidambaram wrote:
>>> Ken,
>>> Sorry forgot to send my build changes for review. I'm attaching the
>>> changes I've made in jsft build.xml file, please make sure the
>>> attributes I've added are correct, and if you want to add more let
>>> me know. Once the changes are approved, I'll check it in.
>>>
>>> The change is for adding version id to the manifest file in YYYYDDMM
>>> format
>>>
>>> thx
>>> Senthil
>>>
>>> Ken Paulsen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I don't see json.jar in the java.net repositories anywhere.
>>>>
>>>> The JSFT-dynafaces.jar file already had a version number as part of
>>>> its name (0.1), not sure if you want to change that or not.
>>>>
>>>> The JSFT jar file, should have version 1.2... and I'd prefer we
>>>> just call it jsftemplating.jar if you can get the correct version #
>>>> to appear in the Manifest file (1.2_YYYYMMDD). Senthil, we talked
>>>> about this... were you able to make it work? If not, we can put
>>>> it as the proposed name for now (although w/ 1.2 instead of 1.0).
>>>> http://download.java.net/maven/1/com.sun.jsftemplating/
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Ken
>>>>
>>>> Anissa Lam wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Senthil,
>>>>> Here is the list of jars that needs to be published to maven
>>>>> repository.
>>>>> Since we are using woodstock 4.0.2, we can use this release
>>>>> number for those that doesn't have a release # assoicate with it.
>>>>> I just not sure about json.jar, it probably is available
>>>>> somewhere, but i can't find it. If you know of any that is
>>>>> available, i believe we can just use that one. Ken ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *WoodStock 4.0.2 release:*
>>>>> dataprovider.jar dojo-0.4.1-ajax.jar prototype-1.5.0.jar
>>>>> webui-jsf-suntheme.jar
>>>>> webui-jsf.jar json.jar
>>>>>
>>>>> *JMaki: * jsfcompounds-0.0.2.jar
>>>>> ajax-wrapper-comp-1.0.2.jar The following jars is
>>>>> already available, so no need to do anything.
>>>>> *
>>>>> Apache*
>>>>> commons-io-1.2.jar commons-fileupload-1.1.1.jar
>>>>>
>>>>> *JSFTemplating:*
>>>>> jsftemplating-dynafaces-0.1-1.0.jar
>>>>> jsftemplating-1.0.jar
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>> Anissa.
>>>>>
>>>
>>