Ummm, so I've been waiting about a week for approval on these changes......
On 10/23/07, Michael Phoenix <michaelandrewphoenix_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> OK, I'm trying to get approval for making Web page modifications to
> correct stuff that I don't have questions on. As soon as get the OK on the
> latter I'll start making changes.
>
> 1. I'm going to add to the tutorial page a brief description of how the UI
> components are named in the factory files as Leonid described in an answer
> to my question on this.
>
> 2. Do some googling on facets and link to good sources in the tutorial
> where facets are mentioned.
>
> 3. Put a link to Leonid's docs on handlers in the tutorial.
>
> We still need documentation on events and the project architecture. Is
> there anybody with the necessary knowledge and time to do this? I have the
> time, but not the understanding of JSFT internals.
>
> As soon as get the OK I'll start on the changes that I can make.
>
> Mike
>
>
> > > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > > From: Ken Paulsen < Ken.Paulsen_at_sun.com>
> > > > Date: Sep 25, 2007 9:18 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: recommendations for JSFT website/Google calendar down
> > > > To: Michael Phoenix < michaelandrewphoenix_at_gmail.com>
> > > > Cc: Ken Paulsen < Ken.Paulsen_at_sun.com>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Michael Phoenix wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Ken,
> > > >
> > > > Are we having a meeting tomorrow? If so, you may want to send out a
> > > > reminder, because google calendars appears to be down.
> > > >
> > > > Ok, thanks for letting me know... reminder sent.
> > > >
> > > > i've also gone over the JSFT website. Here are some
> > > > questions/observations on the tutorials and set ups.
> > > >
> > > > 1) Is "sun:" always the prefix for components? If not, where is the
> > > > code that handles setting the tag prefix?
> > > >
> > > > No... the annotation in the "factory" file specifies this. The
> > > > "sun:" components are the "Woodstock" components. There is some mapping
> > > > facility implemented in JSFTemplating, however, only the Facelets syntax
> > > > currently supports this... we need to implement this in the "template"
> > > > syntax as well.
> > > >
> > >
> > > OK, so where is the 'factory" file located? There is nothing with a
> > > similar filename in the project.
> > >
> > > 2) Facets really should be better explained. Maybe even a link to an
> > > > online source outside of java.net would be a good idea.
> > > >
> > > > Facets or Facelets? I agree, we can and should link to info on
> > > > both.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I was talking about facets, although we really should have
> > > documentation on all the facelets work and how to use it as well. I can
> > > actually probably find a link to the facets documentation on-line. Those
> > > folks who have worked on the facelets stuff should write up some good docs
> > > for the website.
> > >
> > > 3) Event and Handlers needs A LOT of work. It doesn't come close to
> > > > explaining to a novice how and why s/he should use these.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I agree... Leonid Lamburt recently provided an HTML page that
> > > > begins to explain the difference between handlers, we still don't have
> > > > anything that explains the advantages and when/why you'd use an event.
> > > >
> > > > https://jsftemplating.dev.java.net/doc/eventsHandlersList.html
> > > >
> > >
> > > I can put a link to this in the tutorial.
> > >
> > > 4) Finally, for developers on the JSFT project, it would be good to
> > > > have an area that talks about the project architecture including the
> > > > important classes.
> > > >
> > > > Yes again! :)
> > > >
> > >
> > > Who can do this? It needs to be somebody who understands the project
> > > well.
> > >
> > > In the future, should I be sending these sort of emails directly to
> > > > the developer list?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, that would be fine... others can then reply and send in their
> > > > opinions as well.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > Ken
> > > >
> > >
> > >
>