haven't tried to publish with ant before, but at a min. I hope we can do
that. Some good points.
BTW - While at work I'm behind a fire wall and can't even get to most
java.net projects on the web much less IRC...Man it sucks! So while I
figure out how to hack my way out of here Im not on IRC during the day.
On 5/30/07, Ken Paulsen <Ken.Paulsen_at_sun.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Jason Lee wrote:
>
> On 5/30/07, Frederick Brock <frederick.brock_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I rolled maven out on a project sometime back and it took a little while
> > for us all to feel comfortable with it. My goal at the time was to
> >
>
> mvn fred:ensureQuality
>
>
> lol!!
>
> As for dropping support for 1.6.5, I haven't heard anyone say no... so
> lets start doing the work to require ant 1.7 and drop ant-apt.jar.
>
> Ken
>
>
> Sorry. Really bad joke... :P
>
>
> ensure that we had quality checkpoints prior to check in. With maven it
> > was easy to enforce a test-driven approach and to ensure everyone was using
> > the same workstation configuration while still allowing them to use whatever
> > ide they wished.
> >
>
> IDE project generation is one of the cool features for me. It's the only
> thing (I think) that I can't get in ant, at the moment.
>
>
> From an opensource perspective, Im hoping maven will make it even easier
> > to download and use jsftemplating. when all you have to do is add it to
> > your pom.xml (my famous last words!!) it's pretty easy to get up and
> > running quickly.
> >
>
> You can publish to a maven repo with ant (using the Maven Ant libs,
> iirc). We're doing that in the JSF RI, at the moment. For what that's
> worth.
>
>
> --
> Jason Lee, SCJP
> JSF RI Dev Team
> http://blogs.steeplesoft.com
>
>
--
Frederick R. Brock
frederick.brock_at_gmail.com