On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Linda DeMichiel <linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com
> wrote:
> In attention to being a reflector of the expert group email list, this list
> is also intended to be used for the discussion of such topics. Members of
> the expert group are expected to monitor it.
>
Great; I thought as much. I know that this list is supposed to be a
reflector of the expert group but I think maybe something is broken with the
Kenai infrastructure. *This* list hasn't had a post since July:
http://java.net/projects/jpa-spec/lists/users/archive/2011-07/ The expert
group mailing list however has had 34 posts in September alone:
http://java.net/projects/jpa-spec/lists/jsr338-experts/archive/2011-09/
My apologies again if I'm looking in the wrong place or have misunderstood
what "reflector" means. It would indeed be nice if I only had to subscribe
to one mailing list, but I'm willing to stay on both.
I'll collect my thoughts about the auditing feature before I post anything
as I know you guys are under the gun for the 2.1 release and I don't want to
waste anyone's time.
Thanks,
Laird
--
http://about.me/lairdnelson