Nigel,
one day late :-) but I've issued this:
http://java.net/jira/browse/JMS_SPEC-88
I actually was thinking seriously about abandoning the whole thing, because the simplified API is such a huge benefit already. But when I tried around a little bit, I found that receiving and dispatching messages is still rather tedious.
I'd really love to hear all your comments.
Rüdiger
On 2012-03-21, at 19:14, Nigel Deakin wrote:
> Rüdiger,
>
> I would be very happy for you (or anyone else) to create a JIRA issue for each of these. I will then add them to the list of possible issues which I will ask the expert group to help prioritize for further discussion.
>
> (I've already set Friday as a "deadline" for new issues but if anyone needs a bit more time just let me know. I have one or two new issues myself)
>
> It would be helpful if JIRA issues contained enough technical detail to allow readers to understand what is being proposed without needing to immediately come back with a request for more information.
>
> Nigel
>
>
>
> On 21/03/2012 16:04, Rüdiger zu Dohna wrote:
>>
>> Binding JMS to CDI events or the MessageAPI are currently out of scope, right?
>>
>> On 2012-03-16, at 15:36, Nigel Deakin wrote:
>>
>>> Reminder: one week to go.
>>>
>>> On 12/03/2012 18:13, Nigel Deakin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Now that we've reached the JMS 2.0 Early Draft stage it's time for a review of where we are and what additional changes we may wish to consider adding between now and the JMS 2.0 Public Draft in Q3 2012.
>>>>
>>>> If you have something in mind which is not already covered in this list, please log it as a new JIRA issue, and I'll add it to this list. Please make any new proposals by the end of Friday 23rd March 2012.
>>>
>>> Nigel
>>>
>>