I'd say this is low-priority enough to leave to vendors/other standards
more geared towards JMS interoperability.
On 3/2/2012 4:49 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Would it be worthwhile to define a standard WSDL, within JMS, for
> supporting messaging?
>
> John
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Nigel Deakin <nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com
> <mailto:nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> (I'm working my way through the various suggestions made in JITA
> over the past few months. Most of them I'm deferring for later
> discussion, but one or two of them I'm raising now.)
>
> I refer to this JIRA isste
> http://java.net/jira/browse/JMS_SPEC-6
> raised by fribeiro
>
> He wrote: "The W3C has developed an "official" SOAP binding for
> JMS that should probably be referred to by the next release of the
> spec. http://www.w3.org/TR/soapjms/"
>
> The spec referred to is "SOAP over Java Message Service 1.0, W3C
> Recommendation 16 February 2012" edited by representatives from
> IBM, Progress Software and TIBCO. (IBM and TIBCO are represented
> on this expert group...)
>
> It's not obvious to me what change is needed to JMS; the document
> referred to is dependent on JMS, not the other way round. Does
> anyone here think we need any changes to JMS, perhaps to make a
> SOAP binding easier in some way?
>
> Nigel
>
>
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
> Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2114/4846 - Release Date: 03/02/12
>