(Forwarded email from Clebert, who he having his mail bounced by java.net)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: *Clebert Suconic* <clebert.suconic_at_gmail.com <mailto:clebert.suconic_at_gmail.com>>
Date: Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 8:48 AM
Subject: Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: TCK test that the transacted and acknowledge mode parameters are ignored
To: jsr343-experts_at_jms-spec.java.net <mailto:jsr343-experts_at_jms-spec.java.net>
The first thing I'd like to find out is whether there is anywhere else in the EJB or Java EE spec(s) which describe
(or allow) the use in a Java EE container of JMS resources which do not support JTA transactions. This may be a new
use case we need to define when clarifying the spec.
I was a consultant before joining JBoss, and I could always use a non JCA connection factory. I don't think this is
specific to JBoss... (both on JMS and JDBC).
And as an user, there are use cases where I don't want to use the JCA connection factory.
I would maybe specify on the docs that's possible for the user to use a non-JCA Connection Factory on a container if
there isn't a wording for that already, but that won't belong to the JMS specification. Either EE or JCA specs.
--
Clebert Suconic
http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com