From: John D. Ament <john.d.ament_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 19:51:20 -0400

The way I take it, based on the messages I've seen posted, is that there's a
big difference between "JMS 2.0" and "JMS2". I guess like NIO, NIO2? I
remember javaposse complaining about that approach on their podcast. I
guess, can we make this "JMS2" at this point?