Hi,
I worked on a proposal for defining message APIs with a plain interface.
http://java.net/projects/jms-spec/pages/MessageApi
It's lots of examples and to be useful by itself, a final version would
need to duplicate the description of many JMS features. Open questions
are indented.
What do you all think? It could just remain a parallel track until
everybody gets more confident in this alternative.
Rüdiger
@Nigel: I've seen that you'll be doing a session on JMS 2.0 at devoxx in
November. I'll be there, too. Looking forward to meeting you in person!