John,
I'm a bit tied up the next couple of days but will take a detailed look
and send you comments as soon as I can. My proposal should be done by
Friday.
Thanks,
Reza
On 8/16/2011 9:14 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Attached are documents containing my proposal for CDI support in JMS
> 2.0. There are two documents:
>
> 1. JMS2.0AtInjectSupport - this document describes basic injection
> capabilities that are desirable to JMS 2.0. These injection
> capabilities allow for the injection of the standard JMS client
> APIs into any managed object within a bean archive. This document
> also describes some minor API changes that I believe would help
> simplify development.
> 2. JMS2.0EventMessaging - this document describes a mapping process
> from POJOs to JMS Messages, usage of the CDI Event model API to
> send events that were observed as JMS messages to specified
> destinations and to handle incoming JMS messages as CDI events.
>
>
> I started to put these up on the wiki, however the formatting support
> in the wiki doesn't seem to be there for how I was looking to
> structure the documents, but I'll work on getting them in; I really
> wanted to get the documents out there as I work with the wiki. I
> recommend reading these documents in the numbered order as listed in
> this email. I tried very hard to not make them dependent on one
> another, however there are some shared contents between them. It
> makes sense to support both if either is chosen for support, however
> there is no required behavior between the documents that is no touched
> upon by both. I'm not sure what the process should be for review, but
> I figure we should set a time limit on the review period, maybe 2
> weeks? (Nigel, I hope you can provide some feedback on a timeline,
> since one of the issues we noted on the call was a time frame for
> draft). I assume all comments should be posted back to the EG, If
> anyone would like to ask me specific questions related to CDI, I
> assume it's fine to ask directly. As a note, these should be
> considered in parallel to Reza's documentation on a Spring-styled API.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> John
>
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
> Version: 10.0.1392 / Virus Database: 1520/3839 - Release Date: 08/16/11
>