Nigel,
Yes, that is fine.
Cheers,
Reza
On 8/2/2011 6:13 AM, Nigel Deakin wrote:
> So we have Wednesday, 0600 EDT, 1100 BST.
>
> OK with you, Reza?
>
> Nigel
>
> On 02/08/2011 10:32, John D. Ament wrote:
>> Nigel,
>>
>> Let's say tomorrow, 11am your time?
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 5:22 AM, Nigel Deakin <nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com
>> <mailto:nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
>>
>> John,
>>
>> Would you like to propose a day and time that works for you? My
>> diary is pretty quiet most days until America gets to the office.
>>
>> This doesn't have to be a long call.
>>
>> Nigel
>>
>>
>> On 02/08/2011 02:10, Reza Rahman wrote:
>>> John,
>>>
>>> I'm fine with an earlier call. The earliest I can realistically
>>> do is about 6 AM EST. That might be easier for Nigel too.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Reza
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/1/2011 9:00 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>>>> You are a lucky one then.
>>>> I'm a bit of a morning person honestly. Any qualms with an
>>>> earlier call?
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Reza Rahman
>>>> <reza_rahman_at_lycos.com <mailto:reza_rahman_at_lycos.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Nigel,
>>>>
>>>> I do have quite a bit of scheduling flexibility. Anythings
>>>> that works for you, John, others is honestly fine by me.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Reza
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 8/1/2011 6:56 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>>>>> Nigel/Reza,
>>>>>
>>>>> This week's pretty bad for me to be honest. I can
>>>>> potentially do Thursday at 9, but not 10.
>>>>>
>>>>> John
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Reza Rahman
>>>>> <reza_rahman_at_lycos.com <mailto:reza_rahman_at_lycos.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Nigel,
>>>>>
>>>>> Any of those times work for me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Reza
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 8/1/2011 1:00 PM, Nigel Deakin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 29/07/2011 20:48, Reza Rahman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> * I wonder whether a good way forward might be
>>>>> for Reza or John or both jointly, to come up
>>>>> with a detailed proposal.
>>>>> - Sounds like a good idea. John and I can
>>>>> actually arrange face-to-face meetings if he
>>>>> is up for it. It's up to you if
>>>>> you want to stay involved right now. I think
>>>>> its a good idea to have a conference call to
>>>>> bootstrap things. After that,
>>>>> John and I can work out the details and keep
>>>>> you involved as it makes sense.. I imagine we
>>>>> should be able to come up with
>>>>> something in a week or two...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, let's talk about this on the phone and agree
>>>>> a scope for some initial proposals.
>>>>>
>>>>> How about a conference call this week? In the
>>>>> interests of openness this will be open to any EG
>>>>> member, but I think the only people who need to
>>>>> take part are those who want to help Reza come up
>>>>> with some proposals.
>>>>>
>>>>> Looking at the time zones Reza, John and I are in,
>>>>> and plucking some times out of the air, how about
>>>>> 1000 or 1100 EDT on Tuesday/Wednesday/Thursday?
>>>>> (All six times are OK by me).
>>>>>
>>>>> Nigel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----
>>>>> No virus found in this message.
>>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
>>>>> Version: 10.0.1390 / Virus Database: 1518/3803 -
>>>>> Release Date: 08/01/11
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> No virus found in this message.
>>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
>>>>> Version: 10.0.1390 / Virus Database: 1518/3804 - Release
>>>>> Date: 08/01/11
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> No virus found in this message.
>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
>>>> Version: 10.0.1390 / Virus Database: 1518/3804 - Release Date:
>>>> 08/01/11
>>>>
>>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
> Version: 10.0.1390 / Virus Database: 1518/3804 - Release Date: 08/01/11
>