If you are using templates, you could wrap it in every template.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 3:03 AM, Dietz, Randall <randall_at_dietz.id.au> wrote:
> Cheers Vetle,
>
> While that might work, I don't want to have to wrap all my POJO's to alter
> the JSON formats... sounds a bit clunky. It appears that it can be done in
> Jersey, but I can't find any working examples.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 12:14 AM, Vetle Leinonen-Roeim <vetle_at_roeim.net>
> wrote:
>
>> What does your POJO look like? Dont' you just need to add a wrapper
>> class, something like this:
>>
>> public class Foo {
>> private Widget widget;
>>
>> // Getters & setters
>> }
>>
>> That would serialize the Foo class, and since it has a property called
>> "widget", it should output { "widget": { ... }}
>>
>> On Fri Feb 06 2015 at 8:38:06 AM Dietz, Randall <randall_at_dietz.id.au>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> EmberJS is expecting JSON in the format of:
>>>
>>> { "widget": {"id":123, "name":"widget123"}}
>>>
>>> Out of the box, my Genson-enabled POJO format is:
>>>
>>> {"id":123, "name":"widget123"}
>>>
>>> This topic doesn't appear to be covered very much on the InterWeb...
>>> what few "solutions" I can find are mostly incomplete or confusing.
>>>
>>> I suspect Genson does not produce this kind of JSON... but can someone
>>> recommend a solution that can?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>
>