What "performance" are you trying to measure? Response time, response time
under maximal load, degradation behavior in overload, throughput,
scalability? They're all almost totally independent of one another, and a
server that's good in one scenario might not be so good in others. Further,
the answers will likely change when you add your own code, which might
interact well with one server and one measure, but poorly with another
combination. Heck, the comparison on one host OS might be totally different
on another. You should really just write your real code, then deploy it
twice in test scenarios that closely match the real systems you expect to
use (that goodness for cloud systems, that kind of testing was very
expensive to set up before).
Sorry, not terribly helpful. All that said, I imagine someone will offer
some nuggets of experience.
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 9:05 PM, <users-request_at_jersey.java.net> wrote:
> Table of contents:
>
> 1. [Jersey] Fwd: cxf restful vs Jersey Performance? - Navindian <
> navindian_at_gmail.com>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Navindian <navindian_at_gmail.com>
> To: users_at_jersey.java.net
> Cc:
> Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 00:11:35 +0530
> Subject: [Jersey] Fwd: cxf restful vs Jersey Performance?
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Navindian <navindian_at_gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 00:10:51 +0530
> Subject: cxf restful vs Jersey Performance?
> To: users_at_jersey.java.ne
>
> Hi
>
> Can i have an example of cxf and jersey where i could measure the
> performance.
>
> Also please let me know which is faster for read only webservices.
>
> Thanks
> Naveen
> +919849601145
>
> End of digest for list users_at_jersey.java.net - Sun, 03 Nov 2013
>
>
--
Simon Roberts
Certified Professional Photographer
http://dancingcloudphotography.com
(303) 249 3613