[Jersey] Re: Jersey 2.2 Spring Integration issues

From: Marko Asplund <>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 23:38:33 +0300

Daniel Kirkdorffer wrote:
> Interesting. That probably should be called out in the documentation,
because while I had seem allusions to the fact it relies on
> annotations, I couldn't find anything to confirm that. Plus, as there
may be plenty of reasons to need to use XML configurations, it
> probably should also be pointed out they can still be used to supplement
the annotation driven wiring.

Yes, I agree - the Spring integration module documentation could be

I created a pull request for Spring integration documentation that
explicitly states that the integration is annotation based.