You could add a vote for this:
https://java.net/jira/browse/JERSEY-1275 ;)
On 16 July 2013 01:51, William Ferguson <william.ferguson_at_xandar.com.au>wrote:
> I'm running inside Jetty which has it's own logging that is redirected to
> stdout by default.
> Shouldn't JUL also default to stdout? I'm not seeing anything from Jersey.
> I don';t think I've had to configure JUL in the last 10 years.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Paul Moore <paulkmoore_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sorry, that should be "Content-Type".
>>
>> Also, with regard to your logging question, Jersey uses the Java platform
>> util logging (JUL). The easiest way to configure this depends on your
>> environment. On Glassfish, in the admin console, goto Configurations >
>> server-config > Logger Settings. Goto the "Log Levels" tab, and change or
>> add a Logger Name of "org.glassfish.jersey"with an info level of your
>> liking (click Save).
>>
>> P
>>
>>
>> On 16 July 2013 00:57, Paul Moore <paulkmoore_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi William,
>>>
>>> Obvious things first...
>>>
>>> Did you set the ContentType header of the HTTP request from the client?
>>>
>>> Best
>>>
>>> Paul
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16 July 2013 00:52, William Ferguson <william.ferguson_at_xandar.com.au>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm struggling to determine why Jersey is not matching a JSon POST
>>>> Request against a Resource configured to consume
>>>> MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON
>>>>
>>>> I have configured my Application with JacksonFeature.class and
>>>> packages for my Resources. And the GET Resources are happily being served.
>>>> But any Requests that consume JSon POJO are not being matched.
>>>>
>>>> @POST
>>>> @Path("/create")
>>>> @Consumes(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
>>>> @Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
>>>> public Meet createMeetJson(Meet meet)
>>>>
>>>> What component is responsible for making the matching decision?
>>>> Is there some way to switch on debug level logging so I can determine
>>>> why the match is not being made?
>>>>
>>>> Jersey looked so promising originally but I'm finding the lack of
>>>> visibility very frustrating.
>>>>
>>>> William
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>