+1 for non-maven support
On Jun 7, 2013, at 10:45 AM, <simon_at_dancingcloudphotography.com> wrote:
>
> All this said, however, it would be more "normal" and I believe more
> helpful if the primary download link actually linked directly to
> downloads, with brief indications of their purpose. By all means offer
> the pom elements, since maven is clearly very popular (and for good
> reason), but please don't ignore the rest of us with this new release!
> Descriptive/explanatory material is good, but it should not hide the
> primary purpose of the page. It might be better if it were linked off
> the side of a table, so that it can be found easily when needed, but
> not hide the important details for those not interested. And, given the
> interim nature of the maven repository, I think it would be a good idea
> to add that information even if only temporarily, so that those who
> automate their dependencies aren't just looking at a list of errors.
>
> Meanwhile, congratulations on the new release, I know how much work
> goes into these things. And, particularly, congratulations on getting
> the client api standardized. That was actually what triggered my
> attempt to get this all going and upgrade from the older version.