It is the latter, content negotiation. I believe use of terminology
"conneg" is not uncommon in the standards space, may be it is too
abbreviated for a class name.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Ted M. Young [@jitterted] <
tedyoung_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Is Conneg connection negotiation or content negotiation? I thought it was
> the latter. Another reason why that's a bad name.
>
> ;ted
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:43 AM, cowwoc <cowwoc_at_bbs.darktech.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Please excuse this minor rant... This is the only instance of name
>> mangling I've ever ran into in Java. Wouldn't
>> UriConnectionNegotiationFilter be more readable?
>>
>> Gili
>>
>
>