users@jersey.java.net

[Jersey] Re: Jersey 2.0 timetable guesses

From: cowwoc <cowwoc_at_bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 03:21:02 -0500

     My mistake. The last link should have read:
http://java.net/jira/browse/JERSEY-682 -- I'm asking for a way to use
Guice with InMemoryTestContainerFactory.

Gili

On 08/11/2012 3:19 AM, cowwoc wrote:
>
> Yet another :) http://java.net/jira/browse/JERSEY-623
>
> Most of these are quite old
>
> Gili
>
> On 07/11/2012 1:10 PM, cowwoc wrote:
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> I've got another issue that needs to be considered for 2.0:
>> http://java.net/jira/browse/JERSEY-1561
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gili
>>
>> On 31/10/2012 10:57 AM, cowwoc wrote:
>>> Hi Marek,
>>>
>>> I am mainly concerned about the ability to run tests in
>>> parallel. The relevant issues are:
>>>
>>> http://java.net/jira/browse/JERSEY-705
>>> http://java.net/jira/browse/JERSEY-710
>>>
>>> I personally favor running each unit test against its own server
>>> (so we need the ability to run multiple servers in parallel). The
>>> alternative is to run multiple tests against the same server but I
>>> dislike the idea because it makes it difficult to isolate errors.
>>>
>>> There are also these two issues that are minor but might break
>>> backwards compatibility:
>>>
>>> http://java.net/jira/browse/JERSEY-708
>>> http://java.net/jira/browse/JERSEY-702
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Gili
>>>
>>> On 29/10/2012 10:14 AM, Marek Potociar wrote:
>>>> As always, life is a matter of priorities :) We'll be trying hard to make sure the new APIs are in a good shape before release. Still, can you share your top 5 RFEs?
>>>>
>>>> Marek
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 25, 2012, at 9:23 PM, cowwoc<cowwoc_at_bbs.darktech.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On a related topic, I hope you keep 2.0 in beta until you're absolutely sure you want to freeze the API :) I've been a lot of RFEs in JIRA that would benefit from the flexibility of being able to change the API. Once you freeze it they will have to wait for 3.0 (which could be years away).
>>>>>
>>>>> Please make a full sweep over all open RFEs before deciding to freeze 2.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Gili
>>>>>
>>>>> On 25/10/2012 3:03 PM,markecassidy_at_yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>>> Since Jersey 2.0 is dependent on JAX-RS 2.0 finishing, does anyone have
>>>>>> a guess as to ETA on when a production-ready release of Jersey 2.0
>>>>>> would likely be available? Just wondering if we should stick to 1.x
>>>>>> for systems that will be going live in 4Q 2013.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for any prognostications!
>>>>>> Mark
>>>
>>
>