That looks great, thanks a million.
On 16 December 2011 13:43, Gerard Davison <gerard.davison_at_oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
> Our of interest I ran pak200 on the 1.8 jars I have handing around and it
> got it down to around 140kb for both, might help with your other
> dependencies.
>
> Gerard
>
>
> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/jweb/tools/pack200.html
>
> On 12 Dec 2011, at 15:21, Pavel Bucek wrote:
>
> $ ls -alh
> ./trunk/jersey/jersey-client/target/jersey-client-1.12-SNAPSHOT.jar
> -rw-r--r-- 1 pavel staff 127K Dec 12 10:28
> ./trunk/jersey/jersey-client/target/jersey-client-1.12-SNAPSHOT.jar
> $ ls -alh ./trunk/jersey/jersey-core/target/jersey-core-1.12-SNAPSHOT.jar
> -rw-r--r-- 1 pavel staff 451K Dec 12 10:28
> ./trunk/jersey/jersey-core/target/jersey-core-1.12-SNAPSHOT.jar
>
> so 576kB in total. And there is some opportunity to shrink it (excluding
> some classes from jersey-core). You should be able to create something like
> "jersey-client-repackaged-bundle" which would contain just classes for your
> specific purpose..
>
> Pavel
>
> On 12/12/11 3:57 PM, António Mota wrote:
>
> My mistake, it's about 15Mb, not 100... and that includes another big lib
> I'm using, ICEpdf and dependencies, and my own code of course.
>
> Nevertheless too big, I'll have to bring that down.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> On 7 December 2011 08:32, Pavel Bucek <pavel.bucek_at_oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> 100 MB? That definitely doesn't sound right, Jersey client dependencies
>> shouldn't have more than 3MB in total.. depends on what do you need, but in
>> most common cases it should work with jersey-client and jersey-core. You
>> might want to add jersey-json and jackson libs if you are processing json,
>> but even that is maybe like ~5MB ..
>>
>> Can you post list of your dependencies? (mvn dependency:tree)
>>
>> Pavel
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/6/11 7:03 PM, António Mota wrote:
>>
>> Hi again.
>>
>> Now my applet using the Jersey-Client is working quite well, however
>> with all the Jar dependencies is now above 100Mb... Is there a way to
>> reduce this size, besides removing the jars one by one and see if it works?
>>
>>
>> Cheers.
>> *
>> *
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>