users@jersey.java.net
[Jersey] Why isn't JerseyServletModule an abstract class?
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
Next in thread
] [
Replies
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: doug arro <
doug_arro_at_yahoo.com
>
Date
: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
Hello Jersey Devs,
Is there a reson for JerseyServletModule to be a concrete class instead of an abstract class? Isn't this class intended to be extended by others?
Thanks,
doug
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Farrukh Najmi: "[Jersey] Re: Spring's _at_Autowired field not being set within root resource class"
Previous message
:
John G. Lussmyer: "[Jersey] Re: PermGen Memory Leak in Tomcat"
Next in thread
:
Jakub Podlesak: "[Jersey] Re: Why isn't JerseyServletModule an abstract class?"
Reply
:
Jakub Podlesak: "[Jersey] Re: Why isn't JerseyServletModule an abstract class?"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]