Hi Jakub,
Great, there is a JIRA for this enhancement:
http://java.net/jira/browse/JERSEY-777
As soon as I'll be able I'll take a look at it, as I'm quite fancy
getting known Jersey :-)
Cheers!
Pedro
On 09/21/2011 02:46 PM, Jakub Podlesak wrote:
> Hi Pedro,
>
> +1 for the 2. option.
>
> And yes, contributions are warmly welcome.
> Please file a RFE, and attach a patch there.
>
> Thanks,
>
> ~Jakub
>
> On 21.9.2011 12:05, pallipp_at_gmail.com wrote:
>> Howdy!
>>
>> I think it would be nice if we could have an additional support for
>> byte[] instead of just flat File objects in FormDataBodyPart. I think
>> there are situations in which we don't need to hit the disk before
>> sending the data through the wire (or do we?)
>>
>> According to the javadoc [1] there is only a File object support.
>>
>> If you agree that such feature is acceptable, than I think that either:
>> 1. The FileDataBodyPart should be adjusted to support byte[] or,
>> 2. Another subclass of FormDataBodyPart should be created which will
>> support the byte[].
>>
>> Personally, I'd prefer the 2. option.
>>
>> What do you think about that?
>> Are you open for contributions?
>>
>> The idea for this feature was born in Arquillian project [2].
>>
>> Cheers!
>>
>> Pedro
>>
>> [1] -
>> http://jersey.java.net/nonav/apidocs/1.9.1/contribs/jersey-multipart/co
>> m/sun/jersey/multipart/file/FileDataBodyPart.html
>> [2] - https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-569
>>